|
Electoral Reform and Party Financing
Bill C-2, the New Canada Elections Act: Brief to the
Senate
Standing
Committee on Legislative and Constitutional Affairs
Anna
Di
Carlo,
April
5, 2000
Madame
Chairman
and Members
of the Committee,
The
Marxist-Leninist
Party
of Canada welcomes this opportunity to appear before the Senate
Committee
as it reviews Bill C-2, the proposed Canada
Elections Act, since it is
the last stage of the legislative process at which the possibility
exists
to block its passage into law.
Bill
C-2
has been introduced
and passed by the Liberal Party with opposition expressed by the other
parties in the House of Commons, by all of the other registered
political
parties. It was drafted and amended in virtually complete disregard of
the many recommendations and proposals presented in 1998 when the
review
of the Canadian electoral system was conducted by the Standing
Committee
of the House of Commons on Procedure and House Affairs, and later
during
the review of the tabled legislation by the Standing Committee. Most
importantly,
it was drafted and passed in complete disregard for the profound and
deepening
crisis of Canada's political system, which is evidenced by the
increasingly
low levels of voter turnout, just one of the expressions of the
consciousness
of Canadians that the electoral process is not one which leads to their
representation, and is not one which enables them to exercise their
rights
to participate in the governance of the society. The fact that the
current
government speaks in the name of a "majority" when the Liberal Party
received
votes from less than 29 percent of the eligible electors, the lowest
ever
in Canadian history, attests to the profound crisis of this
system.
It
is our
opinion that Bill
C-2 should be rejected for two main reasons.
First
of
all, it fails to
provide the most minimal requirement of an electoral law which
recognizes
the right of citizens to equality before and under the law and of equal
benefit and protection of the law in terms of the right to elect and to
be elected. The absence of what is called an "even playing field"
within
the context of the first-past-the-post system of party government is
found
in the unequal treatment of political parties whereby the parties in
the
House of Commons are given privileges in the sphere of electoral
funding
and electoral broadcasting, some more than others. The Party in Power
is
given the greatest privilege. Bill C-2 failed to correct this violation
of the right to equality, a fundamental democratic principle if the
electoral
law is to be truly free and fair according to any modern conception.
Some
of the
privileges accorded
to the political parties in the House of Commons are also in violation
of the requirement for nonpartisanship in the conducting of elections.
In this regard, the recommendation by the Chief Electoral Officer that
the partisan appointment of Returning Officers be replaced with a
system
of hiring on the basis of merit was rejected by the Liberal Party. So
long
as the electoral law does not eliminate patronage in all aspects of the
electoral process, medieval notions of privileges will continue to
negate
a modern conception of rights. Attempts to provide such a thing with a
justification in the 21st century only deepen the legitimacy crisis in
which the government of Canada is mired.
This
failure
to provide Canada
with an electoral law which is in keeping with the demands of a modern
democracy is the main reason why Bill C-2 should be rejected. Bill C-2
is not enabling legislation for the exercise of the Fundamental
Freedoms
set out in Part 1, Section 2 and the Democratic Rights set out in
Section
3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
To
meet the
democratic principle,
today these rights cannot be informed by the aim of the past which was
that elections must enable the emergence of "a clear and coherent
political
will in the form of party government." Unless elections provide a level
playing field so that all electors and candidates who present
themselves
for election have an equal opportunity to win, the legitimacy crisis
facing
the Government of Canada will not be overcome.
Providing
an
even playing
field would address this key problem facing the political process at
this
time. Elections are for purposes of electing a government, presently
comprised
of the Party in Power and the Party in the Opposition. This government
must represent the popular will and be seen to represent the popular
will.
Unless this is the case, legislation passed by that Government - an
expression
of the legal will - lacks legitimacy.
Bill
C-2
provides for an
electoral process which no longer gives rise to a credible
representation
of the people, seen besides other things in the fact that no party can
claim national representation. It is also seen in the increasing use of
motions of closure in the House of Commons to stop debate. It is seen
in
instances such as the implementation of Free Trade despite the fact
that
the majority of voters cast ballots against Free Trade. It is seen in
the
fact that Canada was involved in war without the House of Commons even
deliberating on the matter.
While
some
express this problem
in terms of Parliament having become a "joke" because inevitably
legislation
is railroaded by the Party which forms the Cabinet, or that politicians
are inherently corrupt, or that elected representatives have to "toe
the
party line," we believe that the problem stems from the failure of the
electoral and political process to enable all citizens to participate
in
governance. The legal will is no longer the expression of the popular
will
of the people. Neither is the Government of Canada seen as representing
the popular will nor are the parliamentary debates or procedural
arrangements
such that the popular will gets expressed in the form of the legal
will.
A very deep legitimacy crisis has emerged.
In
this
situation, the need
for electoral reform which favours renewal is greater than ever. The
current
electoral process which came into being at a time only men of property
were entitled to vote and be elected, even though the franchise has
been
extended, has outlived its purpose. The clear and coherent political
will
of the citizens of Canada can only be expressed through a system of
direct
democracy. The system of party government and its electoral process
represents
vested interests. Far from addressing this problem, Bill C-2 further
favours
those interests. It has nothing to do with enabling Canadians to govern
the society they depend on for their living.
In
sum,
Bill C-2 gives privileges
and benefits to political parties rather than recognizing the equality
of citizens and their right to govern their society. It negates the
right
to elect and be elected by enabling political parties to dominate the
electoral
process, even though the membership of political parties constitutes a
mere 2% of the Canadian population. It enables these parties to have
complete
control over who will stand as candidates, and excludes citizens from
controlling
the selection of their candidates.
The
Marxist-Leninist
Party
of Canada calls on the Senate to reject Bill C-2 and set out a new
process
which would enable the electors to fully exercise their right to elect
and to be elected, beginning with the selection of candidates and
providing
public funding to finance the actual electoral process, not political
parties,
especially the ones with privilege and power. This would include the
creation
of Electoral Commissions which would ensure that citizens are enabled
to
exercise rights to recall elected representatives and to initiate
legislation.
We are providing the Senate Committee with a full elaboration of our
proposal
as an Appendix.
Thank
you.
|